Archive for March, 2009
2006, Hogue, Cabernet Sauvignon
2006, Hogue, Cabernet Sauvignon, approx. $10
The latest issue of Wine Spectator lists the 2007 as an 89. So, I figured the 2006 might not be too bad. I was very wrong. I rarely stop after a glass, so I tried a second. I stopped at the second. The wine was dry, flat and slightly bitter. I was very disappointed. It has been placed on the bottom shelf of the fridge for future cooking uses.
2007, Alamos, Malbec
2007, Alamos, Malbec, approx. $11
Strolling through the Heinen’s in Pepper Pike I noticed a sign directing attention to this wine. My first exposure to Malbec a number of years ago left me with the impression the grape variety was plain. With all of the recent press coverage on how the wines of Argentina are rapidly improving, I thought to give Malbec another try. I was glad I did. I enjoyed the wine thuroughly with a meaty chili made of venison. This wine was a cross between a CA Cabernet and Zinfandel. I think I am going to have to add Malbec back on the list of grape varieties to actively explore.
2005, Clos du Bois, North Coast, Cabernet Sauvignon
2005, Clos du Bois, North Coast, Cabernet Sauvignon, approx. $12
I saw this 2005 Cab mixed on the shelf with a similarly labeled 2006s. So, I figured CA
2005 vintage, worth a try at this price. I wasn’t blow away, but I wasn’t disappointed
either. It was very enjoyable at this price point. I enjoyed the wine with my wife’s
excellent sloppy joes. I did come away withanything particularly memerable, but if you are
looking for a safe play at around $12, I think you will do well by this wine. That being
said, I am not sure if I saw it again if I would go out of my way to purchase it.